G'day Guys,

Welcome to the Speedo Forum.

If you are a guest, you can only see a small portion of the forum. Members like posting their speedo selfies so I don't like that to be 100% public. However, joining is free.

If you are a new member, you need to email me your username so I can manually activate your account. This is a pain (for you and me) but it is the only way I've been able to keep the spam bots from ruining the forum. My email address is: DaveEvans@SpeedoFetish.com

This forum is free and I don't allow any advertising (except my own sites), if you would like to donate please click the link above, all donations go towards the hosting and maintenance of the forum for everyone to enjoy.

Dave 'Speedo' Evans
Webmaster/Speedo Enthusiast

shorter shorts

General speedo discussion - questions/ideas.

Moderator: DaveSpeedoEvans

User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: USA

shorter shorts

Post by Matt » Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:22 pm

With the nice weather I brought out my shorts this

week but I'm tired of the baggie dork shorts every guy

on campus wears.Any suggestions on shorter shorts

you've seen for summer? I want something big enough

to cover a speedo but not super tight.Something I could

bike in too about the size of underwear trunks. Matt

User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: USA

Post by Matt » Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:20 am

Anybody have Aussiebum footy shorts. Would they work

for biking?Matt

bigjay

Post by bigjay » Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:30 am

Here are just a couple of things that I found while looking through my catalog.

I don't think any of them are what you are looking for but one of them might be close. At least this way we could have a better idea of what you are looking to find.

http://www.undergear.com/product.asp?na ... 8074F8E17F

http://www.undergear.com/product.asp?na ... 801EAC617F

http://www.undergear.com/product.asp?na ... 804350617F

http://www.undergear.com/product.asp?na ... 804350617F

I thought the last two here might be closer to what you were talking about.

User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: USA

Post by Matt » Thu Mar 15, 2007 3:44 pm

Thanks BigJ. I'll try some of those.What I did today was buy 4 pairs of Merona nylon/spandex trunk underwear at Target and I'll try them out for biking tomorrow Matt

C

Post by C » Thu Mar 15, 2007 6:14 pm

Matt--you'll like them. They're comfy and easy to get on...or off. I personally wouldn't bike in them because of the lack of padding, but you've got me wondering how they look wet. :o

bigjay

Post by bigjay » Thu Mar 15, 2007 7:54 pm

I wonder how they look in general, wet would be a plus for me!!

User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: USA

Post by Matt » Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:32 am

I tried them this morning for biking and they worked

great.Bike dude I agree though for long ditaances they

wouldn't work because not enough padding.Yes they

do cum off easily and look great when wet. :lol: Matt

C

Post by C » Fri Mar 16, 2007 10:30 am

Excellent.

BigJay--Those are those white briefs that I posted a few days ago. Now let's see how they look on Matt, wet or dry!

bigjay

Post by bigjay » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:38 am

Thanks Bikedude I will look back so I have an idea of what they look like.

PL

Post by PL » Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:19 pm

I guess I've given away my age by now in previous posts, so what the h---. In the 70s when I was a teenager, a 5-inch inseam was considered long. A 3 inch inseam was about normal. If you wanted to show the crotch of your whities (no young peope wore boxers back then), you had an even smaller inseam. This continued through most of the 80s, but that stopped by 1990. Matt really is right in calling these "shorts" these days dork shorts. I honestly don't get it. What's the purpose in wearing shorts that go below your knees? Especially when it's hot as hell outside?! I thought that one of the purposes was to help you cool down. I'm hoping that shorter shorts come back sometime.

User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: USA

Post by Matt » Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:29 pm

You're right they're hot to wear and I don't want

different tanlines.Matt

PL

Post by PL » Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:44 pm

What are these guys trying to hide? Why do "shorts" need to have a 15-inch inseam? Or even a 5-inch inseam?

C

Post by C » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:49 pm

PL wrote:What are these guys trying to hide? Why do "shorts" need to have a 15-inch inseam? Or even a 5-inch inseam?
Fat. Lots and lots of fat. And in the US and UK, there's that infatuation with prison culture with the shorts that show crack but no thigh. I don't really get it.

bigjay

Post by bigjay » Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:52 pm

I am lost here guys? I prefer shorts above the knee because they're cooler. I think that the guys who wear the pants half way down their asses look stupid. My friends always say if you think "it" is that big that people want quick access than just pull it out.

PL

Post by PL » Wed Mar 21, 2007 5:10 pm

BikeDude and others - I don't get it either. What's so bad about showing the thigh?!?! Jace has a great idea- just take the scissors to the dork shorts. In summer of 2005 when it was hot as hell where I live, I said hell with it ("it" meaning the modern culture that dictates prison shorts or guys) and bought some jean "shorts" at wal-mart and cut them down to size - even made one with practically no inseam - very easy access. They're cheap and great and help keep me cool (in the temp sense) in the summer.

JerseyBulge

Post by JerseyBulge » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:49 pm

HEY GUYS! try target i get my shorts there and they have shorter cuts the longest i got were mid thigh look and fit great to. some are a bit shorter and they are a nice casual look to with out being obscene. . . but if you really wanted to you could ;)

bigjay

Post by bigjay » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:50 pm

I want to, hehe!

JerseyBulge

Post by JerseyBulge » Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:52 pm

well lets just say i love em and ad to that "commando"

K

Post by K » Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:50 pm

PL wrote:BikeDude and others - I don't get it either. What's so bad about showing the thigh?!?! Jace has a great idea- just take the scissors to the dork shorts. In summer of 2005 when it was hot as hell where I live, I said hell with it ("it" meaning the modern culture that dictates prison shorts or guys) and bought some jean "shorts" at wal-mart and cut them down to size - even made one with practically no inseam - very easy access. They're cheap and great and help keep me cool (in the temp sense) in the summer.
The "sagging" of the pants as its now known as begain, actually, in prison where inmates would drop their pants below their asses (and below their knees) to say they were "ready for buisness". It then caught on in the ghetto where many of the population had been in prison and now has spread to almost all teenagers and some adults now.

So the whole thing started as a symbol of sex through the ass....nice huh?

bigjay

Post by bigjay » Sat Mar 24, 2007 5:33 am

K thanks for that because here is the knowledge I was given. Apparently a friend of mine who dated a couple black guys said that he told her everything. The symbol that she was told about the ass high pants is that is just normal to them. That is what str8 guys should wear. To them guys who wear pants like I do and a lot of the population is gay. They think that the str8 leg pant look on the waist is a gay thing so most people who wear them that way are gay. Now that is not a concensus of the entire population, maybe just the area that her ex was from. Personally my friends and I always thought is was them trying to tell the ladies they have a big one and are ready for business. So if we were in a mall we would say to them, if its so big lets see it. I mean who dress like that, have you seen them run?? K - I like you explanation and it makes sense too. However should I ask everyone who wears their pants like that if they are ready for me to stick it up their ass, lol, I'm kidding!!?

Post Reply